Anyone can view PRPTalk, PRP Placements and Eyetalk but you must be a College Member and logged in to the College website to post a reply or to start a new discussion
You are here: Forum Home > Students > PRPTalk > Taking PD's
| Author | Subject: Taking PD's |
|---|---|
abd
|
Taking PD's
Dec 20, 2005 17:04:10 hiya all hope all is well and good I had a question with regards to taking distance PD's by someone who is monocular. Other canthus to inner canthus is too variable and taking the near PD and adding 3/4mm is incorrect. So how does a monocular individual take distance PD's. Many thanks |
palfi
|
RE: Taking PD's
Dec 20, 2005 19:59:10 You can use a pupilometer. I know of no other way that is accurate. However, you can get a decent reading by using a light from a torch placed just under your dominant eye to make a reflex on the cornea. if you line the ruler up on the corneal reflex of the px eye opposite yr dominant eye - butyou twist yr face towards that you - then you twist yr face the other way and read the ruler at the other eyes corneal reflex. You have to twist your face as far as you would for your pd - which is like a little wag which you can judge by practicing in a mirror. hope it helps - palfi |
abd
|
RE: Taking PD's
Dec 23, 2005 10:13:28 many thanks for your reply, however using a pupilometer is rather cumbersome in a routine. i do not understand the second cornal reflex method you have mentioned, would you be kind enough to elaborate further and what do you mean by twisting, is this a literal twist of the head or is it a lateral movement of the head across to the px's other eye. many thanks |
palfi
|
RE: Taking PD's
Dec 23, 2005 19:48:28 its easy --- you look straight on to yr px and line up the ruler with yr good eye to his eye that is oposite yr good eye. Then you (as my tutor said) put your nose over nipple (by twisting yr face) so your good eye is now opposite the other eye - read ruler. Quite accurate. I will also explain this mether on theoptom.com website for benefit of other pre-reg students. palfio |
Michael Johnson
|
RE: Taking PD's
Jan 11, 2006 17:55:05 A common rule-of-thumb for estimating the near PD from the distance PD is to minus 2.5 mm. You could invert this guide, ie measure near PD, then add 2.5 mm. I accept that it will not be perfect, but is very unlikely to be out by > 1mm. This is adequate for refraction purposes. If you subsequently dispense, then a pupillometer can be used for greater accuracy. |
Steven M
|
RE: Taking PD's
Jan 14, 2006 16:35:46 -which the same as doing the half pd ( you put the '0' of ruler to middle of bridge - and then measure where the corneal reflex comes on the ruler) and doubling = which could possibly be more accurate, I wonder. |
samadd
|
RE: Taking PD's
Jan 14, 2006 19:11:59 problem then if Px has assymetric pds... Use the pupillometer, or get good at your error correction judgement. |