Anyone can view PRPTalk, PRP Placements and Eyetalk but you must be a College Member and logged in to the College website to post a reply or to start a new discussion
You are here: Forum Home > Students > PRPTalk > henson 3200
| Author | Subject: henson 3200 |
|---|---|
 sheena
|
henson 3200
Mar 19, 2005 15:31:55 are there any disadvantages to the henson 3200 |
|
Homer
|
RE: henson 3200
Mar 19, 2005 16:21:22 Time and therefore money. |
|
Jasteel
|
RE: henson 3200
Mar 19, 2005 16:36:49 Does analyse results as well as humphrey. |
|
nerius
|
RE: henson 3200
Mar 19, 2005 16:59:40 no gaze tracking device, hence need to look at the patient in dim illumination in order to ensure they're fixating on the central target. |
|
Michael
|
RE: henson 3200
Mar 19, 2005 19:28:31 Only central field Full threshold takes a long time No monitoring of fixation No statistical analyses (I think - at least inferior to Humphrey, anyhow)
|
|
Tim Hunter
|
RE: henson 3200
Mar 20, 2005 07:34:54 Humphrey Field Analyser more likely to be used in HES therefore your field results will not always be regarded as reliable by the HES and you may not be able to take part in shared/co-managed care schemes. |
|
sheena
|
RE: henson 3200
Mar 20, 2005 18:02:44 thanks every one |