Why is a review of the Opticians Act needed?
14 November 2022
Autumn 2022
The Opticians Act 1989 underpins the General Optical Council’s regulatory work. Sophie Goodchild looks at why a review was needed, the response from stakeholders, and the next steps.
Splitting refraction from eye health testing is the worst possible course of action for public health and wellbeing,” says Richard Knight.
As Head of Policy for the Local Optical Committee Support Unit (LOCSU), Richard has been engaging with England's local optical committee (LOCs) forums on LOCSU’s response to the General Optical Council’s (GOC’s) call for evidence on the Opticians Act.
The call for evidence has elicited strong responses regarding what should or should not change in the Act, which governs many aspects of optometry practice – particularly those related to primary care. The suggestion that the sight test be split among several aspects in the GOC’s review are causing optometrists concern.
Under the current legislation, the GOC has powers to regulate on matters such as registrants’ Continuing Professional Development, fitness to practise and registration. The Act ensures that no one can practise as an optometrist or dispensing optician – or use those protected titles – without being registered, and therefore regulated.
Not already a member of the College?
Start enjoying the benefits of College membership today. Take a look at what the College can offer you and view our membership categories and rates.
Related further reading
The review sets the day-to-day budgets of government departments over the next three years.
This position statement outlines cross-sector support for safe, ethical and evidence-based adoption of AI.
The College of Optometrists and the Optical Fees Negotiating Committee (OFNC) call on the government to make a long-term commitment to primary eye care in its NHS 10-Year Health Plan as part of the shift from hospital to community.